Why did the Supreme Court dismiss Haryana's plea against the quashing of the extra marks policy, calling it a 'populist measure'
SC dismisses Haryana's plea on extra marks policy, stating it as a 'populist measure'.
- The Supreme Court dismissed Haryana's plea against the quashing of the extra marks policy, considering it a 'populist measure' due to its potential impact on merit-based admissions.
- Extra marks policy could compromise the integrity of the admission process by artificially inflating scores and giving undue advantage to certain candidates.
- The court emphasized the importance of maintaining a fair and transparent system that prioritizes merit over arbitrary adjustments in marks.
- By terming the policy as populist, the court indicated that it may have been implemented for political gain or public approval rather than genuine educational reform.
- Ultimately, the decision aimed to uphold the principles of fairness and equality in the education system.
Answered
10 months ago