What are the long-term effects of a Supreme Court advisory opinion on government policy-making?

The Supreme Court has given an advisory opinion, and I am curious about how such opinions shape the
Author Photo Amit Aspirants
A Supreme Court advisory opinion is given under Article 143 of the Indian Constitution, where the President seeks the Court’s advice on a matter of public importance. Although these opinions are not legally binding, they have significant long-term effects on government policy-making. Guidance for Policy Formulation: Advisory opinions clarify constitutional provisions or legal questions, helping the government frame policies that are constitutionally sound and less prone to legal challenges. Precedent Value: Even though not binding, t ...more

How can the new TB vaccine for adolescents and adults impact public health strategies in India?

With a new TB vaccine ready for commercialisation, I am curious about how this development could cha

How does the Supreme Court's advisory opinion influence the functioning of the government and judiciary?

I want to understand what happens when the Supreme Court gives an advisory opinion. Does it have any
Author Photo Rahul Aspirants
Tuberculosis (TB) remains a major public health challenge in India, which has the highest TB burden in the world. Current strategies focus on early detection, treatment, and prevention, but the only available vaccine (BCG) is mainly effective in children. The introduction of a new TB vaccine for adolescents and adults could significantly alter India’s approach to TB control. Expanded Prevention: A new vaccine targeting adolescents and adults would help protect age groups that are most affected by active TB, reducing new infections and tra ...more

How does denying or accepting the presence of tigers impact conservation policies in a state?

The Goa government has changed its stance on the presence of tigers in the state. I want to understa
Author Photo Amit Aspirants
The acknowledgement or denial of tiger presence by a state government has significant implications for wildlife conservation policies and public perception. Tigers are a flagship species, and their status often determines the level of protection and resources allocated to their habitat. Legal Protection and Funding: Accepting tiger presence can lead to stricter legal protection for forests under laws like the Wildlife Protection Act, and may attract central government funding and support for tiger conservation projects (like Project Tiger). ...more

How could banning cash donations up to ₹2000 impact transparency and political funding in India?

The Supreme Court is considering a plea to stop even small cash donations to political parties. I wa
Author Photo Kumar Aspirants
The issue of political funding in India has long been associated with lack of transparency and potential misuse of anonymous cash donations. Currently, political parties can accept cash donations up to ₹2000 without disclosing the donor’s identity. The Supreme Court is considering whether banning even these small cash donations could improve transparency and accountability. Increased Transparency: Banning cash donations up to ₹2000 would require all contributions to be made through traceable banking channels like cheques, bank transfe ...more

What are the challenges and advantages of having a new Chief Justice lead the Supreme Court Collegium?

With Justice Surya Kant becoming the 53rd Chief Justice of India and heading the Collegium, I wish t

How does the transfer of cases between courts impact the perception of judicial impartiality?

Rabri Devi has sought the transfer of CBI and ED cases to another court, alleging bias. I want to un
Load More