Why did the Supreme Court describe Haryana's extra marks policy as a 'populist measure'

- The Supreme Court described Haryana's extra marks policy as a 'populist measure' because it was seen as a move to garner public support or favoritism. - The Supreme Court dismissed Haryana's plea regarding the extra marks policy because it was perceived to be arbitrary and discriminatory. - The Court emphasized that the policy violated principles of equality in education and was against the spirit of fair competition among students. - The judgement highlighted that the extra marks policy was not based on any rational criteria related to merit or need but rather aimed at pleasing a certain group of individuals. - The Court's decision underlined the importance of preserving the integrity of the education system and ensuring equal opportunities for all students.