How does the loud opposition to the creamy layer contrast with the Centre's position on the sub-quota verdict by the Supreme Court
Examining the contrast between the Centre's positions on the creamy layer and sub-quota verdict.
- The Centre's stance on the creamy layer primarily focuses on addressing inequalities within the reservation system by excluding affluent individuals from the benefits.
- In contrast, the Centre's response to the sub-quota verdict by the Supreme Court emphasizes the need to uphold social justice and provide opportunities to marginalized sections of society.
- The opposition to the creamy layer policy often stems from concerns about perpetuating economic disparities and hindering upward mobility for deserving candidates from marginalized communities.
- On the other hand, the Centre's support for the sub-quota verdict reflects a commitment to ensuring equitable representation and access to resources for historically disadvantaged groups.
Answered
9 months ago