How does the concept of 'creamy layer' challenge the idea of equality within reservations for SC/ST communities?

The concept of 'creamy layer' refers to the exclusion of the more advanced and affluent members within a reserved category from availing reservation benefits. While this concept is currently applied to Other Backward Classes (OBCs), its extension to Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) has been debated. This raises important questions about equality within these communities and the effectiveness of reservations.

• Original Intent of Reservations: Reservations were introduced to uplift historically marginalized groups (SCs/STs) by providing opportunities in education and employment, aiming to bring social and economic equality.
• Challenge of Internal Inequality: Over time, a segment within SC/ST communities has become relatively well-off due to repeated access to reservation benefits, leading to the emergence of the 'creamy layer'—the more privileged among the disadvantaged.
• Potential New Inequalities: If the creamy layer within SC/STs continues to benefit disproportionately, the most marginalized and needy within these communities may not receive the intended support, perpetuating internal inequality.
• Impact on Equality: Introducing the creamy layer concept for SC/STs aims to ensure that reservation benefits reach the genuinely disadvantaged, promoting equality within the community. However, it also raises concerns about implementation and the risk of diluting affirmative action for those still facing severe social discrimination.
• Debate on Social vs. Economic Backwardness: Critics argue that unlike OBCs, the basis for SC/ST reservations is deep-rooted social discrimination, not just economic backwardness. Applying the creamy layer may overlook the persistent caste-based discrimination faced even by economically better-off SC/ST individuals.