How can a Supreme Court-appointed SIT ensure impartiality while investigating complaints against organizations like Vantara?

The Supreme Court often appoints a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to probe sensitive cases involving powerful organizations to ensure transparency and justice. When investigating complaints against influential entities like Vantara, it is crucial that the SIT maintains impartiality and public trust.

• Selection of Members: The SIT should comprise officers with proven integrity and no prior association with the organizations under investigation.
• Judicial Oversight: Regular monitoring and reporting to the Supreme Court help prevent undue influence or interference during the investigation.
• Independent Functioning: The SIT should operate independently of local law enforcement and government agencies to avoid external pressure.
• Transparency in Procedures: Maintaining transparent procedures, such as documenting all steps and decisions, helps build credibility and allows for public scrutiny.
• Protection of Whistleblowers and Witnesses: Ensuring safety and anonymity for those providing evidence encourages honest testimonies and prevents intimidation.
• Time-bound Investigation: Setting clear timelines for the investigation reduces scope for delays and manipulation.
• Use of Scientific Methods: Relying on forensic, digital, and other scientific evidence minimizes subjectivity and bias.
• Public Communication: Periodic updates to the public or media, within legal limits, foster trust in the impartiality of the process.