According to the Supreme Court, can Governors sit on Bills that have been passed by the House
The Supreme Court clarifies that Governors cannot sit on Bills that have been passed by the House.
According to the Supreme Court, Governors cannot indefinitely sit on Bills that have been passed by the House. Here are some key points highlighting the Supreme Court's clarification:
- The Governors are bound by the principle of constitutional morality and are entrusted with the duty to exercise their powers in a limited manner.
- The Supreme Court has emphasized that the Governor's power to return a Bill for reconsideration is for a limited and reasonable period, acting as a constitutional check and balance.
- The Governors must exercise their power within a reasonable time frame and cannot delay the Bill indefinitely or without any justification.
- If a Bill is returned by the Governor for reconsideration, it must be done promptly and reasonably, and there must be valid and cogent reasons provided for such action.
- The Supreme Court has enunciated that the Governor's duty is to act constitutionally, negating any arbitrary or whimsical exercise of power.
Answered
a year ago