Why is the Supreme Court angry about a political party's office 'encroaching' on land allotted to the Delhi High Court

The Supreme Court is angry about a political party's office 'encroaching' on land allotted to the Delhi High Court for several reasons: - Violation of allocation: The land was specifically designated for the Delhi High Court, and any encroachment on it is a clear violation of the allocation made by the government. - Impediment to judicial functioning: The encroachment poses a threat to the independent functioning of the judiciary. It hampers the expansion plans of the Delhi High Court and limits its ability to accommodate the increasing workload and provide efficient services to the public. - Questioning the rule of law: This encroachment by a political party's office raises concerns about the party's disregard for the rule of law. It undermines the principles of justice, equality, and the separation of powers. - Judicial autonomy: The Supreme Court is committed to upholding the independence and autonomy of the judiciary. The encroachment by a political party's office on land meant for the High Court undermines this autonomy and interferes with the judiciary's ability to administer justice impartially. - Setting a precedent: Allowing an encroachment on land allocated for the judiciary may set a dangerous precedent for other political parties or entities to exploit and undermine the system. The Supreme Court's anger stems from the need to protect the integrity and functioning of the judiciary as an independent institution of justice.