Why is the eligibility condition of 'both hands intact' for disabled candidates considered arbitrary by Supreme Court
Supreme Court finds NMC's eligibility criteria discriminatory and unreasonable for disabled candidates.
- The condition of 'both hands intact' is considered arbitrary by the Supreme Court as it unfairly excludes candidates with disabilities who may be fully capable of performing medical duties with accommodations or assistive devices.
- The Court found the eligibility criteria to be discriminatory as it does not take into account the actual abilities and qualifications of disabled candidates, focusing solely on a physical attribute.
- By deeming the criteria unreasonable, the Supreme Court emphasized the importance of providing equal opportunities for individuals with disabilities and promoting inclusivity in professional fields like medicine.
- This ruling highlights the need for organizations to reassess their eligibility criteria to ensure they are fair, non-discriminatory, and considerate of all individuals' capabilities.
Answered
2 months ago