Why did the Supreme Court find NMC's eligibility condition for disabled candidates 'antithetical and arbitrary'
Explore the Supreme Court's perspective on NMC's eligibility criterion for disabled candidates and the implications of the ruling.
- The Supreme Court found the NMC's eligibility condition for disabled candidates to be antithetical and arbitrary because it imposed an additional requirement of securing at least 50th percentile in the National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (NEET), which was not applicable to other candidates.
- This differential treatment was seen as discriminatory against disabled candidates, going against the principles of equality and non-discrimination enshrined in the Constitution.
- The Court emphasized that imposing such unequal eligibility criteria hindered the equal participation of disabled candidates in the medical field, depriving them of opportunities based on their disability status.
- The ruling serves as a significant step towards ensuring a level playing field and equal opportunities for disabled candidates in the medical entrance examination process.
Answered
2 months ago