Amit Shah's statement on the constitutionality of reservations for Muslims in India relates to the fact that Article 15(4) and Article 16(4) of the Indian Constitution explicitly mention that reservations are intended for social and educational backward classes, Scheduled Castes, and Scheduled Tribes. 1. Religion-based reservation contradiction: Reservations based on religion would be contradictory to the constitutional provision, as reservations are primarily meant to address historical social disadvantages faced by certain sections of society. 2. Secular principles: India upholds a secular democratic framework, where public policies should not be based on religious beliefs. Therefore, reservation solely based on religious criteria would be against the principles of equality and secularism upheld by the constitution. 3. Impact on social harmony: Implementing religious reservations could lead to division and potential conflicts among various religious groups. One of the founding principles of India is to promote social harmony and unity among its diverse population. 4. Constitutional Driven: Any changes to the reservation system require a constitutional amendment. Shah's statement indicates that, as per the existing constitutional provisions, reservations for Muslims would not be permissible. It is important to note that this is a matter of debate, and opinions on the issue may vary.