Why has the Editors Guild criticized the draft Broadcast Services (Regulation) Bill
The Editors Guild has described the draft Broadcast Services (Regulation) Bill as 'vague' and 'excessively intrusive'.
The Editors Guild has criticized the draft Broadcast Services (Regulation) Bill for several reasons:
- The guild has stated that the bill is vague in its provisions, lacking clarity on various aspects. This vagueness could lead to confusion and misuse of power by regulatory authorities.
- The guild believes that the bill is excessively intrusive, giving extensive powers to the regulatory authorities to interfere with the functioning of broadcast services. This interference could potentially impede the independence of media organizations and curtail the freedom of expression.
- Furthermore, the bill fails to differentiate between different forms of media, treating all broadcasters under the same regulations. This one-size-fits-all approach may not be suitable, as different types of broadcasters have varying ethical and operational considerations.
- The guild is concerned that the bill does not prioritize the protection of journalists and media professionals, failing to provide adequate safeguards against harassment or intimidation.
- Overall, the Editors Guild believes that the draft Broadcast Services (Regulation) Bill needs significant revisions to ensure a fair and balanced regulatory framework for broadcasters while safeguarding the principles of media freedom and independence.
Answered
a year ago