Why does the Congress accuse YouTube of favoring the ruling dispensation
The Congress party has accused YouTube of playing into the hands of the ruling dispensation. Why is this accusation being made?
The Congress party's accusation that YouTube favors the ruling dispensation can be attributed to several reasons:
- Alleged algorithm bias: The Congress party argues that YouTube's algorithms favor content from the ruling dispensation, making it more visible and promoting its views while suppressing opposing content. This bias is seen as an attempt to sway public opinion in favor of the government.
- Monopoly on information dissemination: YouTube's enormous user base and reach allow it to influence public opinion significantly. Congress believes that this influence is being misused by YouTube to promote the ruling dispensation and stifle dissenting voices.
- Selective content removal: The Congress party alleges that YouTube selectively removes content that is critical of the government or exposes its wrongdoings. This deletion of content is viewed as an attempt to maintain a positive image of the ruling dispensation.
- Limited transparency: A lack of transparency in YouTube's content recommendation and moderation processes adds fuel to the accusation. Congress seeks more clarity and accountability from YouTube to address concerns of favoritism.
- Past incidents and political bias: Previous instances of social media platforms getting involved in political controversies have raised concerns about their impartiality. The Congress party believes that YouTube's alleged bias is part of a larger trend of favoring the ruling dispensation.
Answered
a year ago