Why do speakers at the democracy convention believe that 'One Nation One Election' undermines India's federal structure
Speakers argue that the concept of 'One Nation One Election' undermines the federal structure of India.
- The federal structure of India refers to the distribution of powers and responsibilities between the central government and the state governments.
- 'One Nation One Election' proposes that all elections, including those for Lok Sabha (Parliament) and state assemblies, be held simultaneously.
- This concept is criticized as it undermines the autonomy and independence of state governments.
- States have their own unique political dynamics, regional issues, and voter preferences, which may differ from the national level.
- If elections are held simultaneously, state-specific issues could get overshadowed by national issues, reducing states' ability to voice their concerns and priorities.
- It may lead to a situation where state governments constantly align their policies and decisions with the central government, compromising their individuality and impeding healthy federalism.
- Additionally, the financial burden of conducting simultaneous elections would disproportionately impact state governments with limited resources.
- Opponents argue that the 'One Nation One Election' concept disregards the diversity and complexity of Indian federalism and undermines the principles of cooperative federalism.
- They believe that preserving the distinctive voice and identity of each state is crucial for a well-functioning democratic system.
Answered
a year ago