Why did the Supreme Court take coercive steps against 29 States and Union Territories

Discussing the action taken for the absence of functional SAAs in all districts.
The Supreme Court took coercive steps against 29 States and Union Territories regarding the absence of functional Special Juvenile Police Units (SJPU) and Juvenile Justice Boards (JJB) in all districts. Here are the points to summarize the action taken:
  • 1. The lack of operational Special Juvenile Police Units (SJPU) and Juvenile Justice Boards (JJB) violates the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015.
  • 2. The Supreme Court issued various directions to ensure the proper implementation of the Act.
  • 3. Failure to comply with the directives led the Court to take coercive measures against the delinquent states and Union Territories.
  • 4. The Court emphasized the significance of these institutions in the protection of juveniles' rights and interests.
These actions were aimed at ensuring the effective functioning of the juvenile justice system across all districts.
Answered 10 months ago
Rohit Preparing for Civil Services