Why did the Supreme Court reject pleas to include barium and allow joint firecrackers in Delhi
The Supreme Court rejected the pleas to include barium and allow joint firecrackers in Delhi due to concerns regarding air pollution.
The Supreme Court rejected the pleas to include barium and allow joint firecrackers in Delhi for several reasons related to air pollution:
- Concern for air quality: The court recognized the severe air pollution problem in Delhi and surrounding areas, especially during the festive season. The inclusion of barium, a heavy metal, in firecrackers could worsen the already high levels of pollution and pose serious health risks.
- Health hazards: Barium compounds release harmful toxins when burned, contributing to air pollution and causing various health issues. The court took into consideration the potential risks to public health, including respiratory problems, cardiovascular diseases, and exacerbation of existing ailments.
- Previous bans: The court's decision builds upon previous judgments that aimed to reduce pollution levels in Delhi. It highlights the need to prioritize public health and environmental concerns over the temporary enjoyment of firecrackers.
- Government measures: The rejection of these pleas aligns with the government's efforts to curb air pollution and improve air quality standards in Delhi. The court's decision reflects the importance of supporting and implementing regulations to protect the environment and public health.
Answered
a year ago