Why does the Supreme Court say that arresting those bursting firecrackers is not a solution
The Supreme Court has commented on the issue of bursting firecrackers. Explain why the Court believes that arresting those who burst firecrackers is not a solution.
The Supreme Court believes that arresting individuals who burst firecrackers is not a solution due to several reasons:
- Administrative Challenges: Enforcing a complete ban on firecrackers and arresting every individual involved would be difficult for law enforcement agencies, as it requires extensive manpower and resources.
- Focus on Prevention rather than Punishment: The Court emphasizes the need for preventive measures, such as creating awareness campaigns and imposing strict regulations on firecracker production and sale, rather than solely focusing on punishment.
- Educational Approach: The Court values education and awareness as essential tools for achieving a long-term solution. It believes in educating people about the harmful effects of bursting firecrackers to bring about a change in behavior.
- Alternative Solutions: The Court encourages exploring alternative ways to celebrate festivals, such as community gatherings, cultural events, and eco-friendly substitutes for firecrackers.
- Balancing Tradition and Environment: The Court recognizes the importance of cultural traditions but also stresses the need to protect the environment and reduce air pollution caused by firecrackers.
Answered
a year ago