• Law Commission's Revisit to Uniform Civil Code: In 2016, the Law Commission decided to revisit the Uniform Civil Code, which aims at replacing different religious personal laws with a common law governing every citizen’s civil rights. This move was made to ensure gender justice and provide equal rights to women in cases of inheritance, divorce, and property rights.
• Implications of the Revisit: The revisit was seen as an important step towards modernizing India's legal system and making it more equitable and just. It would have brought about much-needed reforms for women's rights.
• Congress's Concerns: The Congress party raised concerns about the Law Commission's move towards Uniform Civil Code. They opposed it on the grounds of religious and cultural diversity, arguing that the personal laws are an integral part of these communities, and any attempt to change them would create unrest and conflict.
• Reasons for Congress's Objections: Congress feels that the Uniform Civil Code would undermine religious and cultural autonomy and lead to the imposition of one belief system on everyone. They believe that personal laws should not be subject to uniformity, as they are based on cultural and religious practices that have been followed for centuries.

Overall, while the Law Commission's move towards a Uniform Civil Code was seen as a progressive step towards gender justice, the Congress party's concerns highlight the need for sensitivity towards religious and cultural diversity in India.