What stance did the Supreme Court take regarding promises made in political manifestos

1. The Supreme Court stated that promises made in political manifestos are not legally binding commitments. 2. The Court highlighted that the mere promise of financial benefits to the public does not amount to corruption. 3. However, the Court emphasized the need for transparency and accountability in fulfilling manifesto promises. 4. It was clarified that the implementation of manifesto promises must follow due process and be in accordance with the law. 5. The Court's stance suggests that while delivering on manifesto pledges that benefit the public financially is not inherently corrupt, any misuse of power or resources for personal gain would be considered corrupt.