What is the role of self-regulation provisions in the draft broadcasting Bill and what are the diverse views on it

The self-regulation provisions in the draft broadcasting Bill play a crucial role in governing the content and conduct of broadcasters. Here are the diverse views on these provisions: 1. Promoting media freedom: Some believe that self-regulation empowers broadcasters to maintain editorial independence without government interference, safeguarding freedom of expression in the media. 2. Ensuring accountability: Supporters argue that self-regulation encourages accountability by making broadcasters responsible for adhering to ethical standards and resolving complaints from the public. 3. Protecting viewers' interests: By enabling broadcasters to voluntarily uphold programming standards and guidelines, self-regulation aims to protect viewers from objectionable content and ensure high-quality broadcasting. 4. Lack of efficacy: Critics argue that self-regulation is insufficient to address the challenges and complexities of the modern media landscape and may lead to lenient enforcement. 5. Potential bias: Some express concerns that self-regulation may be influenced by commercial interests, leading to biased content and inadequate protection of public interest. 6. Need for oversight: Opponents assert that external regulation, independent from broadcasters, is essential to maintain transparency, integrity, and accountability in the broadcasting industry. In conclusion, while self-regulation provisions offer benefits such as media freedom and accountability, diverse opinions exist regarding their efficacy, potential bias, and the necessity of external oversight.