The Karnataka vs. Centre row revolves around the implementation of the free rice scheme in the state. Here are the key points regarding the ongoing conflict: 1. Eligibility: The Karnataka state government wants to increase the eligibility criteria for the free rice scheme from the current below poverty line (BPL) families to even above poverty line (APL) families. They argue that this will help more vulnerable sections of society during tough economic times. 2. Financial burden: The Central government opposes the expansion of eligibility, citing financial constraints. They argue that providing free rice to APL families would strain the already limited resources. 3. Administrative issues: The state government claims that the Central government has delayed the release of funds for the scheme, hampering effective implementation. They argue that this is a deliberate move by the Centre to undermine the state's autonomy and impose constraints. 4. Political implications: The conflict has taken on political undertones, with the ruling party in the state accusing the Centre of discriminatory practices and neglecting the welfare of the state's citizens. Overall, the dispute centers around the expansion of eligibility for the free rice scheme, with both sides having differing perspectives on the feasibility and impact of such an expansion.