What are the implications of Vice-President questioning CJI's involvement in executive appointments

1. Constitutional Separation of Powers: The controversy raises concerns about the independence of the judiciary as enshrined in the Constitution and the principle of separation of powers between the executive and judiciary. 2. Threat to Judicial Autonomy: The Vice-President's questioning of the Chief Justice's involvement in executive appointments can be seen as an encroachment on the judiciary's autonomy, potentially undermining its impartiality and integrity. 3. Judicial Accountability: The debate also highlights the need for greater transparency and accountability in the judicial appointments process to ensure that appointments are based on merit and not influenced by political considerations or personal biases. 4. Public Trust in the Judiciary: Such controversies can erode public trust in the judiciary, which plays a crucial role in upholding the rule of law and protecting citizens' rights. It is essential to address these concerns to maintain the credibility of the judiciary.