What are the implications of the Supreme Court judgment on bail conditions when fundamental rights are not violated
Analyzing the legal parameters set by the Supreme Court for granting bail under specific circumstances.
- The Supreme Court's judgment on bail conditions when fundamental rights are not violated sets legal parameters for granting bail in specific circumstances.
- It emphasizes the importance of considering the nature and gravity of the offense, the potential for the accused to tamper with evidence or influence witnesses, and the likelihood of the accused absconding.
- The judgment also highlights the need to balance the interests of the accused, the state, and the society when determining bail conditions.
- It underscores the principle that bail is the rule, and jail is the exception, emphasizing the presumption of innocence until proven guilty.
- The judgment aims to ensure that bail conditions are fair, reasonable, and proportionate, respecting the accused's right to liberty while safeguarding the interests of justice.
Answered
4 months ago