How might the partial implementation of the National Sports Governance Act impact the autonomy and functioning of sports federations in India?

The National Sports Governance Act aims to regulate and improve the management of sports federations in India, ensuring transparency, accountability, and better governance. If the Act is implemented only partially, it can have mixed effects on the autonomy and daily functioning of these sports bodies.

• Unclear Regulatory Framework: Partial implementation may lead to ambiguity regarding which rules apply, causing confusion among sports federations about compliance requirements.
• Selective Oversight: Some federations may be subject to stricter oversight while others operate with more freedom, leading to inconsistency in governance standards across different sports bodies.
• Reduced Autonomy: Certain provisions, if enforced, might limit federations’ independence in decision-making (e.g., in selection processes or financial management) without providing the full benefits of the Act, such as transparent dispute resolution mechanisms.
• Operational Disruptions: Day-to-day operations could be affected if federations are required to follow new procedures (like audits or reporting), but lack clarity or support for implementation, resulting in delays and inefficiency.
• Potential for Political Interference: Incomplete implementation may open doors for selective intervention by authorities, undermining the spirit of autonomy and potentially leading to favoritism or political influence in sports administration.
• Impact on Athlete Welfare: If athlete-centric provisions are not fully implemented, the intended improvements in athlete welfare, grievance redressal, and performance support may not materialize.
• International Image and Compliance: Partial implementation may raise concerns among international sports bodies (like the IOC) about government interference, risking India’s reputation and participation in global events.