How does workplace harassment in government offices affect the efficiency and morale of public servants?

Workplace harassment in government offices is a serious issue that can have far-reaching consequences beyond the individual victim. It undermines the functioning of government institutions by affecting the mental well-being, efficiency, and morale of public servants. Such incidents, especially extreme cases like attempted suicide, highlight the urgent need to address harassment in order to maintain effective governance.

• Reduced Efficiency and Productivity: Harassment creates a hostile work environment, leading to stress, anxiety, and distraction among employees. This reduces their ability to focus on work, resulting in lower productivity and delays in public service delivery.
• Low Morale: Public servants who witness or experience harassment may feel demotivated and undervalued. This can lead to apathy, absenteeism, and a lack of initiative, further affecting the quality of governance.
• Increased Attrition: Persistent harassment can force talented and honest officers to leave their jobs or seek transfers, resulting in a loss of experienced personnel and institutional memory.
• Damage to Institutional Reputation: Incidents of harassment, especially when they become public, damage the credibility and trust in government institutions, making it harder to attract and retain skilled employees.
• Legal and Administrative Consequences: Harassment cases can lead to legal action, inquiries, and administrative disruptions, diverting attention and resources away from core functions.
• Negative Impact on Decision-Making: Fear of harassment or retaliation may discourage officers from taking bold or innovative decisions, leading to a risk-averse work culture and poor governance outcomes.