How does the Supreme Court view the use of EVMs in elections
The Supreme Court has rejected a plea to revert to ballots, stating that 'EVMs are fine if you win and tampered if you lose'.
- The Supreme Court has upheld the use of Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) in elections.
- It rejected a plea to revert to paper ballots, emphasizing that there is no concrete evidence of EVM tampering.
- The court acknowledged concerns about EVM manipulation but stated that these concerns should not overshadow the reliability and efficiency of EVMs.
- The quote 'EVMs are fine if you win and tampered if you lose' illustrates the perception that losing parties often attribute their defeat to EVM manipulation.
- The Supreme Court's stance is that EVMs play a crucial role in ensuring transparent and efficient electoral processes.
Answered
5 months ago