How does the Supreme Court view the assertion of innocence by accused in serious crimes
The Supreme Court has made a ruling on the assertion of innocence as a ground for bail in serious crimes.
The Supreme Court views the assertion of innocence by an accused in serious crimes in the following manner:
- The Court recognizes that the presumption of innocence is a fundamental principle in criminal law.
- The assertion of innocence alone is not sufficient grounds for granting bail in serious crimes.
- The Court considers various factors, such as the seriousness of the crime, the strength of the evidence against the accused, the likelihood of the accused fleeing or tampering with evidence, and the potential danger to society.
- The Court emphasizes that innocence is to be determined through a trial and not at the bail stage.
- The Court may grant bail if it finds that there are exceptional circumstances indicating a reasonable probability of an innocent person being falsely implicated.
- The Court also takes into account the need for balanced justice, ensuring the rights of the accused are protected while safeguarding the interests of the victim and society.
Answered
a year ago