How does the Supreme Court view the constitutional requirement of informing accused about grounds of arrest
The Supreme Court has stated that informing the accused about the grounds of arrest is a constitutional requirement.
- The Supreme Court views the constitutional requirement of informing the accused about the grounds of arrest as essential to safeguard the rights of the accused.
- This requirement ensures that the accused is aware of the reasons for their arrest, allowing them to understand the charges against them and prepare an appropriate defense.
- The Court emphasizes that informing the accused about the grounds of arrest is a fundamental aspect of the right to fair trial and due process guaranteed under the Constitution.
- Failure to provide this information may result in the violation of the accused's rights, leading to potential legal consequences and challenges to the validity of the arrest.
- Overall, the Supreme Court considers the requirement of informing the accused about the grounds of arrest as a crucial protection against arbitrary detention and unjust treatment.
Answered
3 months ago