How does the Centre's reconstitution of the EPFO governing body affect INTUC and AITUC

The Centre's reconstitution of the EPFO (Employees' Provident Fund Organisation) governing body without representatives from INTUC (Indian National Trade Union Congress) and AITUC (All India Trade Union Congress) has several implications:

• Exclusion of major trade unions: By not including representatives from INTUC and AITUC, which are two prominent trade unions in India, the EPFO governing body fails to represent a significant portion of the working population.
• Lack of diversity and representation: The absence of INTUC and AITUC representatives may undermine the diversity and inclusivity of the decision-making process within EPFO. This could lead to concerns about biased policies or decisions that do not adequately address the concerns of workers.
• Reduced influence and bargaining power: The exclusion of INTUC and AITUC from the governing body weakens their ability to advocate for the interests of their members and negotiate on issues related to employee welfare, social security, and labor rights.
• Potential for conflict and distrust: The reconstitution could potentially result in increased tension and mistrust between the excluded trade unions and the EPFO governing body. This may hinder collaboration, dialogue, and consensus-building efforts on important policy matters.

Overall, the absence of INTUC and AITUC representatives from the EPFO governing body raises concerns about representation, diversity, and effectiveness in addressing workers' issues. It is essential for a robust social security system to include perspectives from a wide range of stakeholders, including major trade unions.