How can the Supreme Court's suo motu intervention influence road safety policies in India?

The Supreme Court of India sometimes takes suo motu (on its own motion) cognizance of critical issues like road accidents, especially when there is a serious threat to public safety. Such interventions can have a significant impact on how road safety policies are formulated and implemented in India.

• Highlighting Policy Gaps: Suo motu action brings national attention to shortcomings in existing road safety measures, prompting governments to review and strengthen policies.
• Issuing Directives: The Supreme Court can issue binding directives to central and state governments for immediate action, such as improving road conditions, enforcing traffic rules, or installing safety equipment.
• Setting Up Committees: The Court may appoint expert committees to study causes of accidents and recommend policy changes, leading to evidence-based improvements.
• Ensuring Accountability: Judicial intervention often holds authorities accountable for lapses in enforcement or negligence, creating pressure to act responsibly.
• Monitoring Implementation: The Court can monitor the progress of its orders through regular hearings, ensuring that government agencies follow through on road safety measures.
• Encouraging Legislative Action: Suo motu cases sometimes result in suggestions for new laws or amendments, such as stricter penalties for traffic violations or better compensation mechanisms for victims.
• Public Awareness: Judicial attention to road safety issues raises public awareness, encouraging safer driving behavior and demand for better infrastructure.