How can the government ensure transparency while respecting privacy in high-profile medical cases?

In high-profile medical cases, the government faces the challenge of balancing the public's right to information with an individual's right to privacy. This becomes especially sensitive when the person involved is a public figure, as public curiosity and concern are heightened. However, privacy is a fundamental right, and authorities must act carefully.

• Legal Framework: Authorities should follow existing laws like the Right to Privacy (Article 21 of the Indian Constitution) and medical confidentiality norms under the Medical Council of India guidelines.
• Consent-Based Disclosure: Information about a person's health should only be shared with explicit consent from the individual or their authorized family members. Without consent, only general updates should be provided.
• Authorized Spokespersons: Designate official spokespersons (such as hospital representatives or government officials) to provide verified information, preventing rumors and misinformation while avoiding detailed disclosures.
• Public Interest vs. Individual Rights: Authorities should assess whether the information is of genuine public interest (e.g., public health risk) or merely public curiosity. Only in cases affecting public safety should more detailed information be considered for release.
• Minimal Disclosure Principle: Share only necessary information—such as confirmation of hospitalization or general well-being—without divulging sensitive medical details unless absolutely required.
• Media Guidelines: Issue advisories to media houses to respect privacy and avoid speculative or invasive reporting, reinforcing the importance of ethical journalism.
• Transparency in Process: Clearly communicate the procedures being followed for medical care and information sharing, so the public understands that transparency is being maintained within privacy boundaries.