How can the conduct of police officers during communal riots influence public trust in law enforcement?

During communal riots, the actions and behavior of police officers are closely watched by the public. Their conduct not only affects the immediate situation but also has a long-term impact on how people perceive law enforcement agencies. The Supreme Court, in cases like the Akola riots, has underlined the importance of police impartiality to maintain public confidence.

• Impartial Enforcement of Law: If police officers act impartially and protect all communities equally, it strengthens the belief that law enforcement is fair and just. Biased actions or targeting a particular group can create mistrust and fear among minorities.
• Protection of Vulnerable Groups: When police actively protect vulnerable sections during riots, it reassures citizens that the state will safeguard their rights, regardless of their religion or identity.
• Handling of Complaints and FIRs: Promptly registering complaints from all affected parties and conducting unbiased investigations shows commitment to justice, which builds public trust.
• Use of Force: Proportionate and legal use of force to control riots is seen as necessary. However, excessive or selective use of force erodes trust and can further escalate tensions.
• Communication and Transparency: Open communication with the public and media about police actions during riots helps counter rumors and misinformation, reinforcing the image of police as protectors.
• Accountability: Holding officers accountable for misconduct during communal violence demonstrates that no one is above the law, which is crucial for maintaining legitimacy and public confidence.