How can government policies both encourage domestic manufacturing and address concerns about monopolistic practices?

There is a debate about the impact of Make-in-India policies and accusations of promoting monopolies. I wish to analyze how policy frameworks can balance industrial growth with fair competition.
Government policies play a crucial role in shaping the industrial landscape of a country. While initiatives like Make-in-India aim to boost domestic manufacturing, there are concerns that such policies might inadvertently foster monopolistic practices. Balancing industrial growth with fair competition requires a nuanced policy framework.
  • Incentivizing Broad-Based Participation:
    • Offer production-linked incentives (PLI) to a wide range of firms, including MSMEs, to prevent concentration of benefits among a few large players.
    • Encourage sector-specific clusters to promote competition among multiple firms rather than a single dominant entity.
  • Strengthening Competition Laws:
    • Empower regulatory bodies like the Competition Commission of India (CCI) to monitor and act against anti-competitive practices such as cartelization or abuse of market dominance.
    • Mandate regular review of mergers and acquisitions to prevent the emergence of monopolies.
  • Facilitating Ease of Entry and Exit:
    • Simplify regulatory clearances, licensing, and compliance procedures to lower entry barriers for new firms.
    • Promote start-ups and innovation through schemes like Start-up India, ensuring new entrants can challenge incumbents.
  • Transparent and Non-Discriminatory Policies:
    • Ensure that incentives and subsidies are based on clear, objective criteria and are accessible to all eligible firms.
    • Avoid tailor-made policies that favor specific companies or groups.
  • Promoting Technology Transfer and Skill Development:
    • Encourage foreign and domestic firms to invest in R&D and workforce training, leading to wider capability development across the sector.
    • Reduce dependence on a few large firms for technological advancement.
  • Public Procurement Reforms:
    • Design government procurement policies that provide opportunities for small and medium enterprises (SMEs) along with large manufacturers.
    • Implement transparent bidding processes to prevent favoritism.
  • Periodic Policy Review and Stakeholder Consultation:
    • Regularly assess the impact of policies on market competition and make necessary adjustments.
    • Engage with industry bodies, consumer groups, and experts to identify emerging risks of monopoly formation.
Answered 10 hours ago
Amrit Aspirants