Why is there a debate on the appointment of ad-hoc judges to High Courts
Recent Supreme Court actions have paved the way for the appointment of ad-hoc judges to High Courts, sparking discussions on the rationale and implications behind such decisions.
- Addressing backlog: Ad-hoc judges can help reduce the mounting backlog of cases in High Courts by temporarily assisting in the disposal of pending matters.
- Lack of regular judicial appointments: Delays in filling up vacancies in High Courts have led to a shortage of judges, prompting the consideration of ad-hoc appointments to expedite justice delivery.
- Quality of justice: Critics argue that appointing ad-hoc judges might compromise the quality and consistency of judgments due to their temporary nature and limited experience.
- Constitutional concerns: Some legal experts question the constitutionality of appointing judges on an ad-hoc basis, as it may conflict with the established norms of judicial independence and separation of powers.
Answered
3 months ago