Why is the Supreme Court advocating for a ‘neutral panel’ in negotiations with protesting farmers
Explore the reasons behind the Supreme Court's preference for a ‘neutral panel’ in negotiating with farmers protesting against farm laws.
- Impartiality: The Supreme Court believes that a neutral panel will ensure impartiality in negotiations, providing a fair platform for both parties to express their concerns without bias.
- Mediation: A neutral panel can act as mediators, facilitating constructive dialogue between the government and the protesting farmers to reach a mutually agreeable solution.
- Expertise: The panel may consist of experts with knowledge of agriculture, economics, and law, who can provide informed recommendations to address the complex issues raised by the farmers.
- Trust-building: By involving a neutral panel, the Supreme Court aims to build trust and confidence among the stakeholders, fostering a conducive environment for resolving the standoff peacefully.
Answered
9 months ago