Why is the Punjab government challenging the extension of BSF jurisdiction to 50 km
The extension of BSF jurisdiction to 50 km has been challenged by the Punjab government in the Supreme Court. What are the reasons behind this challenge?
The Punjab government is challenging the extension of BSF (Border Security Force) jurisdiction to 50 km for the following reasons:
- Violation of State Powers: The Punjab government argues that the extension of BSF jurisdiction interferes with the powers given to the states under the Constitution of India. They believe that law and order should primarily be under the state's control and expanding the jurisdiction of the central forces infringes upon this jurisdiction.
- Conflict with Local Police: The extension of BSF jurisdiction may lead to overlapping responsibilities and confusion with the state police force. This could potentially create clashes between the BSF and the local police, hindering effective enforcement of law and order.
- Impact on Civil Liberties: The Punjab government raises concerns about potential violations of civil liberties and human rights within the extended jurisdiction. They argue that the central forces might not have the necessary understanding of local culture, customs, and legal procedures, which could result in undue harassment of the public.
- Imbalanced Distribution of Power: The extension of BSF jurisdiction could create an imbalance of power between the central and state governments. The Punjab government contends that decisions concerning jurisdiction and security matters should be made jointly, ensuring equal representation and inputs from both levels of government.
Answered
a year ago