Why is the Governor said to hold no veto power over bills

The Supreme Court's ruling on Governor's power over bills.

There are a few reasons why the Governor is said to hold no veto power over bills, based on the Supreme Court's ruling:

The Constitution: The Supreme Court may interpret the Constitution to limit the Governor's power to veto bills. The court could determine that the Constitution grants the Governor limited or specific veto power, which may not extend to all types of bills.
Separation of Powers: The court might emphasize the need for a separation of powers between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Limiting the Governor's veto power prevents an imbalance of power favoring the executive branch and ensures checks and balances are maintained.
Legislative Intent: The court might consider legislative intent when interpreting the relevant laws. If lawmakers intended to curtail the Governor's veto power in certain circumstances, the court could reinforce those intentions.
Precise Language: The court may scrutinize the specific language of the Constitution or relevant legislation to determine the scope of the Governor's veto power. If the language is clear and excludes certain bills from the Governor's veto authority, the court will uphold the limitation.

It is important to note that the specific ruling of the Supreme Court may vary depending on the jurisdiction and the particular case's circumstances.

Answered a year ago

Mohit Preparing for Civil Services