Why is public discussion and constructive criticism of Supreme Court verdicts crucial for the development of law according to Justice Ravikumar
Understanding the role of public discourse in shaping legal development based on Justice Ravikumar's views is important for civil services preparation.
- Public discussion and constructive criticism of Supreme Court verdicts foster transparency in the legal system.
- It enables the public to understand complex legal concepts and decisions made by the judiciary.
- Feedback from various stakeholders can help identify flaws in judgments that may have been overlooked.
- It promotes accountability and encourages judges to be more diligent in their decision-making process.
- Incorporating diverse perspectives through public discourse can lead to more well-rounded and balanced legal principles being established.
- Ultimately, this process contributes to the evolution and refinement of the legal framework, ensuring a more just and equitable society.
Answered
4 months ago