Why is NHRC being criticized by NGOs for being a 'silent spectator'
Examine the reasons behind the criticism faced by NHRC and its alleged lack of action in human rights violations.
There are several reasons behind the criticism faced by the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) for being a 'silent spectator' and its alleged lack of action in human rights violations:
- Inadequate powers: NGOs argue that NHRC lacks adequate powers to independently investigate and enforce action against human rights violations. They believe that NHRC should be granted more authority to have a greater impact on addressing human rights issues.
- Slow response: Critics claim that NHRC often takes a significant amount of time to respond to complaints and initiate action. This delay is seen as a failure to promptly address human rights violations and provide justice to the victims.
- Insufficient resources: NGOs argue that NHRC lacks sufficient financial and human resources to effectively carry out its mandate. Limited resources hinder its ability to investigate cases thoroughly and provide timely interventions.
- Government influence: Critics allege that NHRC is influenced by the government and lacks independence in its functioning. They argue that this limits its ability to take strong action against human rights violations carried out by government officials or agencies.
- Limited visibility: Some argue that NHRC should do more to raise public awareness about its work. Critics claim that the lack of visibility of NHRC's actions contributes to the perception of it being a 'silent spectator' and undermines its credibility.
Answered
a year ago