Why is it important for the HC collegiums to send recommendations for judges' vacancies

• Efficiency and effectiveness: Filling judges' vacancies is crucial for the efficient and effective functioning of the judiciary. The workload on existing judges would decrease, ensuring speedy and timely dispensation of justice.
• Reduced backlog: Vacancies in the judiciary lead to the piling up of cases and a significant backlog. By filling these vacancies, the pending cases can be heard and resolved promptly, reducing the burden on the judicial system.
• Quality judgments: A well-staffed judiciary allows for better distribution of workload, ensuring judges have enough time to carefully analyze cases, conduct research, and deliver well-reasoned judgments. Filling the vacancies ensures the quality of judgments is not compromised.
• Judicial independence: The smooth functioning of the judiciary requires an adequate number of judges. A shortage of judges can compromise judicial independence and increase the possibility of delays and manipulation.
• Court infrastructure: The presence of judges is also essential for the establishment of court infrastructure. Increased vacancies could lead to underutilization of resources, resulting in wasted public funds.
• Judicial reputation: A shortage of judges can have a negative impact on the public perception of the judiciary. It may erode public trust and faith in the justice system, which is pivotal for a democratic society.

Overall, it is essential for the High Court collegiums to promptly send recommendations for judges' vacancies to ensure efficient and effective functioning of the judiciary, timely resolution of cases, preservation of judicial independence, and maintaining public trust and confidence in the justice system.