Why has the Supreme Court refused permission for a married woman to terminate her over 26-week pregnancy

The Supreme Court has denied permission for a married woman to terminate her over 26-week pregnancy due to the following reasons: 1. Medical Grounds: The court may have considered the medical implications of terminating a pregnancy at such an advanced stage. The risks associated with late-term abortions and potential harm to the woman's health might have been a determining factor. 2. Viability of the Fetus: After 24 weeks of gestation, the court might have taken into account the potential viability of the fetus outside the womb. Protecting the rights of a potentially viable life could have influenced their decision. 3. Prevailing Laws: The court operates within the legal framework, and abortion laws may restrict terminations beyond a certain gestational age. The decision might align with existing laws that prioritize fetal rights. Implications of the Decision: 1. Legal Precedent: This decision could set a precedent for future cases involving late-term abortions, guiding the judiciary in similar matters. 2. Debate on Reproductive Rights: This ruling may spark public discussions and debates surrounding women's reproductive rights, bringing attention to the complexities of abortion laws and their implications. 3. Medical Ethics: The decision highlights the ethical considerations associated with late-term abortions and the balances needed between a woman's autonomy and the protection of potential life. It is important to note that the specific context, legal frameworks, and medical circumstances surrounding this case may affect these reasons and implications.