Why does the Supreme Court consider sharing Google location PIN for bail as a violation of privacy
Examine the court's perspective on the privacy implications of exchanging location details for bail.
- This practice infringes on an individual's right to privacy as the sharing of Google location PIN for bail allows authorities to track the person's movements 24/7.
- The Supreme Court views this as a violation of privacy because it enables constant surveillance without proper justification or legal procedures.
- Exchanging location details for bail sets a concerning precedent of overly intrusive monitoring by the state, raising questions about the extent of governmental control over personal data.
- The court emphasizes the importance of safeguarding individuals' privacy rights, especially in the digital age where location data can reveal sensitive and personal information.
- Overall, the Supreme Court considers sharing Google location PIN for bail as a breach of privacy that undermines fundamental rights and requires stricter regulation to protect individual autonomy.
Answered
10 months ago