Why did the Supreme Court mention 'two heads better than one' regarding the CEC's vigilance

1. The Supreme Court mentioned 'two heads are better than one' regarding the Chief Election Commissioner's (CEC) vigilance and decision-making process to highlight the importance of having multiple perspectives and opinions. 2. This statement underscores the idea that collaborative decision-making involving multiple individuals leads to more thorough discussions and better outcomes. 3. By acknowledging that having multiple heads involved can enhance the effectiveness of the CEC's vigilance efforts, the Supreme Court emphasizes the value of diverse viewpoints in ensuring fairness and transparency in the electoral process. 4. Ultimately, the Supreme Court's perspective supports the notion that collaborative decision-making can help strengthen the integrity and credibility of the election system.