Why did the Supreme Court make a different decision in the bail cases of Kejriwal and Hemant Soren
The case of Hemant Soren was not treated similarly to Kejriwal's bail precedent by the Supreme Court, why?
- Kejriwal and Hemant Soren's bail cases were decided differently by the Supreme Court due to the unique circumstances of each case.
- The Supreme Court may consider factors such as the specific legal provisions, evidence presented, and nature of the charges when deciding on bail applications.
- Hemant Soren's case might have involved different charges or legal complexities that led to a separate decision on bail compared to Kejriwal's case.
- The Supreme Court's decisions are based on the merits of each individual case and are not always consistent due to the varying circumstances presented.
Answered
a year ago