Why did the Supreme Court dismiss Panneerselvam's petition against High Court's decision

1. Lack of Jurisdiction: The Supreme Court found that the High Court was within its jurisdiction to suo motu revive the assets case against Panneerselvam.

• The Supreme Court determined that the High Court had the authority to take such action in the interest of justice.
• As a higher judicial body, the Supreme Court respected the decision made by the High Court in this matter.

2. Preserving Judicial Independence: The dismissal of Panneerselvam's petition by the Supreme Court was seen as a way to uphold the independence of the judiciary.

• By allowing the High Court's decision to stand, the Supreme Court demonstrated respect for the judicial process.
• This decision reinforced the principle that courts should be allowed to act independently without interference from other branches of government.