Why did the Supreme Court direct the 'institutionalisation' of environmental regulators
SC directs 'institutionalisation' of environmental regulators, says their scrutiny 'felt to be insufficient'.
- The Supreme Court directed the 'institutionalisation' of environmental regulators due to concerns about the insufficient scrutiny of their actions.
- This decision was made because the Court felt that the current system of regulation and monitoring of environmental issues was inadequate.
- The Court recognized the importance of effective environmental regulation and the need for a robust institutional framework to ensure compliance with environmental laws.
- The decision aimed to enhance the capacity of environmental regulators by establishing dedicated institutions with clear mandates and responsibilities.
- The Court recognized that merely relying on the existing governmental departments for environmental regulation might not be sufficient to address the complex challenges posed by environmental issues.
- The 'institutionalisation' of environmental regulators would involve creating independent bodies or authorities with the necessary expertise and resources to effectively carry out their duties.
- By mandating the 'institutionalisation' of environmental regulators, the Court sought to strengthen the regulatory framework and ensure greater accountability and transparency in environmental governance.
- This decision reflects a growing recognition of the need for specialized and dedicated institutions to address environmental concerns and protect the environment for future generations.
Answered
a year ago