Why did the Supreme Court deny bail to the former PFI chairman in the UAPA case
The Supreme Court denies bail to former PFI chairman Abubacker in a UAPA case.
- The Supreme Court considered the seriousness of the charges against the former PFI chairman in the UAPA (Unlawful Activities Prevention Act) case.
- There was a concern that granting bail could jeopardize national security or public order due to the nature of the allegations.
- The Court may have also taken into account the potential risk of the accused tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses if released on bail.
- Given the gravity of the UAPA charges, the Supreme Court likely emphasized the need to ensure that the legal process is not obstructed and justice is served.
- Denying bail may also have been seen as a measure to maintain law and order while the case is being investigated and prosecuted.
Answered
5 months ago