Why did the Supreme Court decline to intervene in the Gyanvapi case and Allahabad CJ's order
The question delves into the reasons behind the Supreme Court's decision not to intervene in the Gyanvapi case and the order of the Allahabad CJ.
The Supreme Court's decision not to intervene in the Gyanvapi case and the order of the Allahabad CJ can be attributed to several reasons. Here are some key points:
- Lack of jurisdiction: The Supreme Court might have considered that it does not have the jurisdiction to interfere in the matter, as it falls under the purview of the Allahabad High Court.
- Preserving the role of the High Court: The Supreme Court could have respected the independence and authority of the Allahabad High Court by allowing it to handle the case without interference.
- Awaiting High Court judgment: The Supreme Court might have decided to wait for the Allahabad High Court to deliver its judgment before considering any intervention, to prevent any premature ruling or duplication of efforts.
- Principle of judicial restraint: The Supreme Court might have adhered to the principle of judicial restraint, allowing lower courts to first decide on matters before seeking its intervention.
Answered
a year ago