Why did the SC refuse to set aside anticipatory bail given to Bhavani Revanna in an abduction case
The Supreme Court refused to set aside the anticipatory bail granted to Bhavani Revanna in an abduction case.
- The Supreme Court considered the facts of the case and the evidence presented before coming to this decision.
- It found that there was insufficient evidence to suggest that Bhavani Revanna was directly involved in the abduction.
- Anticipatory bail was granted to her based on the principle that a person is innocent until proven guilty.
- The court may have observed that the allegations against Bhavani Revanna were not strong enough to deny her the protection of anticipatory bail.
- The decision to refuse setting aside the anticipatory bail indicates that the court found the initial granting of bail to be justified in this particular case.
Answered
6 months ago