Why did the Delhi High Court stay the trial court order in the Parliament security breach case
The Delhi High Court has issued a stay on the trial court order in the Parliament security breach case, raising questions about the earlier decision.
The Delhi High Court stayed the trial court order in the Parliament security breach case for several reasons, including:
- Lack of evidence: The High Court found that there was insufficient evidence to support the trial court's decision and believed that there were gaps in the prosecution's case.
- Due process concerns: The High Court raised concerns about whether the trial court had followed proper legal procedures during the trial. It believed that certain crucial aspects of the case had not been adequately examined or considered.
- Violation of constitutional rights: The High Court stated that it needed further time to assess whether the defendants' constitutional rights had been violated during the investigation and trial proceedings.
- Change in circumstances: The High Court considered new evidence and arguments presented by the defense that challenged the trial court's order. It believed that these new developments warranted a stay of the order until further examination.
Answered
a year ago